Hot topics for hospital and health system 340B drug discount programs
Achieving true optimization of your 340B program requires constant scrutiny of savings opportunities and a laser focus on achieving compliance. In this issue brief, we examine four priority areas for ensuring compliance with the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and state requirements.
Preventing duplicate discounts is essential for achieving 340B program compliance. Medicaid billing requirements vary by state and may involve different penalties for non-compliance. HRSA requires that covered entities have processes in place to prevent duplicate discounts. Be sure your entity is reviewing the following to prevent these:
Regarding state Medicaid billing requirements, review the following to ensure this information is included:
The process for recording the required information should be defined in your organization’s policies and procedures. Failure to comply with HRSA and state requirements may result in Medicaid overpayment or non-compliance penalties, and penalties can be severe.
CONSIDER |
Note that the federal government recently settled with a California hospital for more than $31 million for Medicaid overpayments.1 |
Internal Audits
Covered entities have a responsibility to ensure the integrity of their own program. HRSA expects that covered entities perform regular internal audits to validate program integrity and compliance. Three main areas to review for compliance include:
Best practices for a robust internal auditing process should cover the following:
HRSA recommends that all covered entities perform an annual independent external audit to ensure that the covered entity is in compliance.
Our 340B Solutions team has more than two decades of experience with the 340B program compliance, oversight, and optimization. |
HRSA expects covered entities to have an oversight committee in place. HRSA wants to see that the oversight committee:
The composition of the committee varies by organization. Consider representatives from the following:
When your covered entity is audited by HRSA, the auditor may ask to see the minutes from your oversight committee meetings. If your organization does not have a committee or lacks notes, HRSA could cite your entity for lack of oversight. HRSA would then expect a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) to be submitted.
Over the past year, accommodations related to location eligibility have been expanded due to COVID-19. Previously, an offsite location was required to be included on a reimbursable line of the MCR in order to be eligible and registered.
Under the new accommodations, covered entities may use 340B drugs at certain offsite locations before such locations are reported on the hospital’s most recently filed MCR and registered in the online 340B database of OPAIS as a 340B child site of the hospital. Permissible use and prescribing of 340B drugs at such offsite locations will continue to be subject to the 340B program definition of “eligible patient” of the hospital. Hospitals remain required to register offsite locations in OPAIS once the location is reported on a filed MCR.
It is expected that this accommodation will remain permanent even after the national health emergency is declared over. The patient still needs to meet the eligible patient definition requirements, and the location will need to be registered as soon as it appears on the MCR as reimbursable.
Be sure to maintain auditable records and outline eligibility scenarios in the policies and procedures for any offsite location.
By establishing and maintaining a robust process, covered entities can help ensure their program’s compliance and achieve optimal savings from 340B. CPS® 340B Solutions has more than two decades of experience with the 340B program compliance, oversight, and optimization. CPS offers independent audits, program maintenance and training assistance, 340B program opportunity assessments, implementation assistance, and 340B program referral capture services to meet HRSA expectations, achieve compliance, and increase savings.
1 https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/oc-based-health-care-organization-agrees-pay-over-315-million-settle-claims-it. Accessed 2.10.22.